Penalty for filing late is reportedly $200, a figure the congressman could cover with a single well-timed trade, which is, colleagues note, the entire problem

WASHINGTON — A member of Congress disclosed 22 personal stock trades months past the legal deadline, among them purchases and sales in marquee technology firms whose fortunes rise and fall on the very policies Congress writes, a lapse the lawmaker's office attributed to a paperwork oversight.
The Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act requires such trades to be reported within 45 days, backed by a penalty of as little as $200 — an enforcement mechanism that Rep. Khanna could satisfy, critics note, with the loose change from a single afternoon on the exchange.
The Press wishes to be scrupulously even-handed, and so notes for the record that being late on these filings is the single most bipartisan activity in Washington, performed by both parties with equal serenity and defended with identical shrugs. We flip the byline above not to accuse one side but to demonstrate that your outrage, too, has a party registration.
Government-ethics advocates have long argued members should not trade individual stocks at all. A bill to that effect passed the House this summer and proceeded directly to the Senate, where such bills are taken to a quiet room and told they are very brave.
Reached for comment, the congressman said he was fully committed to transparency, a word that in this context means the trades were eventually, technically, disclosed.
What actually happened: A NOTUS investigation found the congressman failed to properly disclose 22 personal stock trades on time, including in major technology companies; the STOCK Act requires disclosure within 45 days, with penalties as low as $200.